Dark Ash Bud Moth – Preys ruficeps

A new moth for the garden last night to the 30W UV U-tube. Having been attracted to the light, it didn’t actually enter the Robinson trap and simply sat on the grubby white sheet hanging behind it. Preys ruficeps is its scientific binomial.

Prays ruficeps, micro moth
Prays ruficeps, micro moth

The English vernacular name for this little, black micro moth is the Dark Ash Bud Moth. As the name would suggest, it’s not a brightly coloured moth, although its head is orange. Its larvae feed on Ash (fraxinus). However, there is a complication, until recent DNA testing was carried out this species was simply recorded as a dark, melanic, form of the closely related P. fraxinella, the Ash Bud Moth and wasn’t considered to be a separate species. It ws formally known as Prays fraxinella rustica. This means that the old research on this species was simply lumped together with the original species, according to the UK Moths site, and so little is known about it as a distinct species.

Something I have mentioned before is that often vernacular names for micro moths don’t exist or if they do, there are conflicting names created ad hoc by various lepidopterists and the organisations. When talking science, especially to international colleagues and audiences, it is generally best to refer to the scientific binomial, the name lay people often call the Latin name for an organism. Like that most famous of dinosaurs, Tyrannosaurus rex, it’s perhaps the most well-known scientific binomial, the one used for the king of the terrible lizards. T. rex doesn’t really have a vernacular name.  In fact, I’m not sure any of the dinosaurs do. So, use the binomial and we all know what you’re talking about whether terrible lizard or micro moth.

Meanwhile, I checked on the taxonomy of P. ruficeps on iNaturalist and it gave me some interesting names in other languagues – Juodoji Uosine Kandis (Lithuanian), Bruine Essenmot (Dutch), Sysisaarnikoi (Finnish), and Brun Askmal (Swedish), specifically.

Interestingly, when I looked up Sysisaarnikoi, guessing it was Finnish, Google Translate says that word means “carboniferous”. Which given the coal colouring of the moth and the association with ash, is fair enough. However, if you split the word at koi. It translates as Coal Ash Moth. Koi presumably being moth in Finnish. Split out the presumed word for ash, saarni, and it then translates the name as Autumn Ash Moth. That’s intriguing. Saarni seems to mean “coal” and “Autumn” in Finnish, is that right?

The other names seem more obvious, at least bruine and brun are perhaps obviously “brown” and essen and ask are ash, and mot and mal are moth. I can see that Uosine perhaps shares etymology with ash too. Juodoji is black in Lithuanian and Kandis is moth.

Going back to the moth’s scientific name. The species type, ruficeps, translates from Latin as red-throated, according to Google Translate. Now, given, that caput is head in Latin,  I suspect it more literally translates as red-headed. Rufus being related to ruber and meaning red. But, of course, as many readers may know from my earlier ramblings, when we say red in many situations, we often mean orange, as English took another century or so after the introduction of the eponymous fruit to these isles to adopt orange as a word for the colour we think of as lying between red and yellow. Hence, Robin Redbreast, Red Admiral, Redshank, redhead, where the colour is so obviously orange, not red.

The Prays genus part of the moth’s name? Well, that’s a little more complicated. Jacob Hübner came up with the genus name in 1825. It could have come from a Greek word, praus, meaning “gentle” or “mild,” possibly alluding to the moths’ delicate nature. Or, it may have been a misinterpretation of some obscure Latin word. Most likely though and common for several of Hübner’s names, it was an arbitrary choice that he simply like the sound of.

Also to the garden trap last night, two male Muslin (Diaphora mendica) and the first Pale Mottled Willow (Caradrina clavipalpis) of the year.

Aves envy and moth matters

Occasional visits to relatives who live in the leafy suburbs of Surrey always make me feel a little envious of the habitat represented by their garden and its surroundings. Lots of old oaks and other tree species beyond their fence but plenty of spots for birds (Aves) and invertebrates in their garden.

Scarce Tissue moth
Scarce Tissue moth

I usually get a few moments to survey the life forms in the garden and among those oaks. It doesn’t take long to build a decent garden ticklist of birds. For a recent trip:

Blackbird, Blackcap, Blue Tit, Bullfinch, Buzzard, Carrion Crow, Chaffinch, Chiffchaff, Coal Tit, Collared Dove, Dunnock, Firecrest, Goldcrest, Goldfinch, Great Tit, Greenfinch, Green Woodpecker, House Sparrow, Jackdaw, Jay, Long-tailed Tit, Magpie, Mistle Thrush, Nuthatch, Robin, Song Thrush, Stock Dove, Tawny Owl, Wood Pigeon, Wren.

Lunar Marbled Brown moth
Lunar Marbled Brown moth

I only heard and Goldcrest and it was the Merlin app that picked up the Firecrest. The Tawny Owl was a nocturnal caller, of course. Merlin claimed a Willow Warbler, but I didn’t pick that up aurally or visually. Out on a walk up to and along the Wey River added Canada Goose, Greylag Goose, Mallard, Red Kite. Was half expecting to see House Martin and Swallow, and perhaps Kingfisher, but no such luck with those.

Great Prominent
Great Prominent

Meanwhile, I’d brought my Skinner moth trap with me and put that out for a couple of sessions. Unfortunately, it got very cold (near freezing) during the first couple of nights and there were just a Brindled Pug (NFM) and an Early Grey. Third night was a lot warmer (10 Celsius) albeit rainy, but it brought in a much bigger moth haul. I was very pleased to see a few species I’d not seen before, NFM (new for me) moths. Data for the lighting-up session now with Surrey County Moth Recorder.

Frosted Green moth
Frosted Green

Brindled Pug (NFM)
Frosted Green x3 (NFM)
Great Prominent (NFM)
Grey Pine Carpet
Lunar Marbled Brown x3 (NFM)
Muslin
Purple Thorn x2
Red-green Carpet x2
Scarce Tissue x2 (NFM)
The Streamer

Phone photo of Brindled Pug
Brindled Pug

First Streamer of the year for me in Surrey, and also appeared in our Cambridgeshire garden the night we came home.

The Streamer, so-called because of the streamer-like markings on its forewings

The British butterfly ticklist

There are purportedly 59 extant species of butterfly in the UK. Those marked with an asterisk (twenty, as of April 2025) are ones I’ve yet to record here. There is at least one species that may be recolonising, Large Tortoiseshell. There are others that turn up sporadically, vagrants and migrants and don’t breed here.

  1. Adonis Blue
  2. Black Hairstreak
  3. Brimstone
  4. Brown Argus
  5. Brown Hairstreak*
  6. Chalk Hill Blue
  7. Chequered Skipper
  8. Clouded Yellow
  9. Comma
  10. Common Blue
  11. Cryptic Wood White*
  12. Dark Green Fritillary
  13. Dingy Skipper
  14. Duke of Burgundy*
  15. Essex Skipper
  16. Gatekeeper
  17. Glanville Fritillary*
  18. Grayling*
  19. Green Hairstreak
  20. Green-veined White
  21. Grizzled Skipper
  22. Heath Fritillary*
  23. High Brown Fritillary*
  24. Holly Blue
  25. Large Blue*
  26. Large Heath*
  27. Large Skipper
  28. Large White
  29. Lulworth Skipper*
  30. Marbled White
  31. Marsh Fritillary*
  32. Meadow Brown
  33. Mountain Ringlet*
  34. Northern Brown Argus*
  35. Orange-tip
  36. Painted Lady
  37. Peacock
  38. Pearl-boarded Fritillary*
  39. Purple Emperor
  40. Purple Hairstreak
  41. Red Admiral
  42. Ringlet
  43. Scotch Argus*
  44. Silver-spotted Skipper*
  45. Silver-studded Blue*
  46. Silver-washed Fritillary
  47. Small Blue
  48. Small Copper
  49. Small Heath
  50. Small Pearl-boarded Fritillary*
  51. Small Skipper
  52. Small Tortoiseshell
  53. Small White
  54. Speckled Wood
  55. Swallowtail*
  56. Wall
  57. White Admiral
  58. White-letter Hairstreak
  59. Wood White*

Bullfinch in Les King Wood

Went for a brief butterfly walk in our local woodland, Les King Wood. Saw my first Speckled Wood of the year, lots more European Peacock, Whites (Small and Large), and numerous male Orange Tip. No Brimstone nor Comma on this outing.

Male Bullfinch perched on an overhead power cable
Male Bullfinch perched on an overhead power cable

Just as I was about to head home, I heard a Bullfinch making its plaintive call. Couldn’t see it, so walked along one of the footpaths to bear round the patch where it seemed to be. Still no sign. And, it sounded like it flew off. So, I did a U-turn and headed back to the gate to leave. As if to taunt me, it seemed to come back, calling closer than ever, so I turned again and slowly walked towards where I imagined it was perched. It flew out, perched on an overhead power cable and looked down disgusted at the togger on the ground below.

Not the most evocative photo. The bird looks fine. But, that cable! So, over to a photo algorithm that claims to be able to replace objects. I selected the cable in the app and prompted it to replace the cable with a branch. I had to edit the claws on the branch to make them look slightly more realistic as the app had generated some weird artefacts that weren’t really claws at all. I’m sure there are other apps that do the same job, but this one will do for now as a demo. It’s called photo.ai, by the way.

Male Bullfinch perched on an overhead power cable, replaced with a branch using AI
Male Bullfinch perched on an overhead power cable, replaced with a branch using AI

There had been a very obliging Linnet and some Long-tailed Tits along the edge of the wood earlier.

 

Local Peregrine Falcons – Falco peregrinus

Today, we got to a local site about 20 minutes after the pair of Peregrine Falcons that live there had gone off hunting…at least according to one birder who was leaving as we arrived. We trekked on and awaited the raptors’ return and in the meantime watched several Red Kite, some Common Buzzard, and a couple of nesting Kestrels.

Peregrine Falcon in flight
Peregrine Falcon in flight

The Peregrines turned up about an hour later, preyless. They darted back to their nest site in the chalk cliff. Travelling fast, but not quite at their stooping speed which can be up to 200mph. One of the pair then zoomed off again to look for lunch, leaving the other to stare at us quizzically.

Peregrine on a chalk cliff, angling its head upwards, I suspect it was getting a clearer view o me, rather than looking at anything in the sky
Peregrine on a chalk cliff, angling its head upwards, I suspect it was getting a clearer view o me, rather than looking at anything in the sky
Peregrines often look at you from odd angles…this is perhaps because they have two sharp central focus points in each eye (the fovea centralis), rather than the one we have for each eye. In the Peregrine, one is for long-distance sharp vision that allows it to pinpoint prey from at least a couple of miles away. The second focus point is for shorter distance vision to help it see its prey clearly as it approaches during the stoop.

Peregrine basically means from abroad/foreign. In Latin per is away and egrine from agri meaning field, so “away field” = abroad. Perhaps it is suggestive of the bird somehow being a wanderer, the etymology is unclear.

Peregrine on its nest site
Peregrine on its nest site staring directly at the photographic intruder some distance away (big zoom lens)

Falcon comes from Latin falcis, meaning curved blade/war sickle, and may allude to the curved beak, the talons, or the wing profile…again, the etymology is somewhat lost in the history of falconry.

Butterflies of 2025

It seemed like a slow start to the year. Usually expect to see some of the emerging hibernators and over-winterers in later February. However, my first UK butterfly of the year wasn’t until 5th March, a Brimstone. My first Orange Tip last year was 17th March, and apparently it was the first UK record for 2024. I will update this article as the year progresses and the butterflies appear.

Holly Blue – 8th April – RSPB Lakenheath
Speckled Wood – 6th April – Les King Wood, Cottenham
Orange Tip (male) – 3rd April – Cherry Hinton Chalk Pits
Green-veined White – 1st April – Les King Wood, Cottenham
Small White – 31st March – Allotment, Cottenham
Large White – 31st March – Allotment, Cottenham
Small Tortoiseshell – 9th March – RSPB Ouse Washes, Manea
Peacock – 9th March – RSPB Ouse Washes, Manea
Comma – 8th March – Lamb’s Land, Cottenham
Brimstone – 5th March – Lamb’s Lane, Cottenham

brimstone butterfly 768px
Brimstone

comma butterfly underwing
Comma

European Peacock
European Peacock

Small Tortoiseshell
Small Tortoiseshell

Footnote

We were in Tenerife in early February, we saw several butterfly species: Monarch, Canarian Cleopatra (F), Small Tortoiseshell, Large White, Red Admiral

Amphibian timeline – Operation PondLife

UPDATE: Larval hatchlings by 20th March or thereabouts, and gills and mouth obvious in the tadpoles just under a week later.

Reluctantly, but for safety reasons, I drained and filled our old pond in March 1998 and relocated dozens and dozens of frogs. Luckily, some of the neighbours at the time had ponds. We’d had spawn that year and that was also sent to a friend’s pond elsewhere in the village, hopefully without transferring any problems. It’s generally not advisable to move anything from one pond to another as there are invasive species and pathogens that might be transferred, but I didn’t really know about ponds back in 1998!

2025's first frogspawn
The first frogspawn of 2025, 6th March

In the years after, we’d have an occasional frog in the garden, usually in a wet patch behind the water butts, but sometimes hopping about the garden on sultry summer nights.

I redug the pond in May 2019. Hooray! I made it just half the original water surface area and it was not quite as deep as the old pond. However, I made sure it had terracing within and double lined it. I planted some native aquatic plants. We saw numerous frogs in lockdown year 2020 and the two species of snail present thrived. I did several music sessions live on Facebook as #PondWatch that spring and summer with thousands of listeners at the peak!

The pond attracted and continues to attract several damselflies and dragonflies. The birds seem to use it actively too. Oh, Mrs Sciencebase has witnessed Grey Herons taking frogs from the pond on at least a couple of occasions.

Herpetologist friend tells me that it is possible to have newts and frogs in the same pond. Indeed, this is obvious when it comes to data from another friend’s pond. I had been warned that newts would eat frogspawn, but seemingly it’s more likely that the frogs would predate the newts.

I’ve kept a record of the first appearance of frogspawn each year: 5th March 2021, 21st February 2022, 11th March 2023, 22nd February 2024, 6th March 2025.

Also of note in the summer of 2024 we had our first sighting of a couple of newts in the garden, on the patio on different wet nights, if memory serves.

Voles among us

Voles are rodents related to lemmings and hamsters, but are generally stouter of body and have a longer, hairy tail, smaller ears too. They are sometimes known as meadow mice or field mice. Etymologically speaking, they were generically “field mice”, vole from Old Norse völlr, and related to wold/weald as parts of English place names.

Vole, at the water's edge, Earith car park, RSPB Ouse Fen
Bank Vole, at the water’s edge, Earith car park, RSPB Ouse Fen

Here, we have three species of what we call voles:

Microtus agrestis – the Field, or Short-tailed, Vole, there are an estimated 75 million

Myodes glareolus – the Bank Vole, estimated, 25 million

Arvicola amphibius – European Water Vole, sometimes incorrectly known as the water rat, it is not a rat, despite being called Ratty in The Wind in the Willows. Endangered species. Estimated 100000 individuals.

And, of course, there’s Microtus arvalis – Common Vole, present as a sub-species on Orkney (M. a. orcadensis) and in the Channel Islands, but not in England or Wales.

Distinguishing between the Water Vole and the three meadow voles is relatively easy. Separating Bank from Field is harder unless you can see the tail. The tail of the Field Vole is about 30% the length of its body, whereas that Bank Vole’s tail is much longer, about 50% the length of its body. If you can’t see the tail, there are other indicators, although none seem perfect.

The Bank Vole has a warmer, more rusty, colouration compared to the grey-brown of the Field Vole. The fur of the Field Vole is not quite so smooth and neat as that of the Bank Vole and also largely covers ears and nose, less so in Field Vole. All such indicators can be confused in the field especially when there are variants such as lighter, gingery Field Voles.

Habitat is not a good indicator either, as Field and Bank may well favour similar habitat despite their names. As with many vernacular species names, they can be spurious and based on folklore, pre-scientific observations, and whimsy.

I asked friends on BlueSky to weigh in on the photo above. Terry O’Connor sided with Bank Vole, which was my first thought on seeing it yesterday: “Chestnut with grey underfur looks right and its ears are on the big side for Field Vole.”

One of my biggest missed opportunities photographically speaking was to capture a shot of a Grey Heron gulping down a Water Vole while standing on the roadside verge along a local road bridge over one of our lodes.

I did get photos of a Bank Vole that was swimming across the river in front of the Earith car park at RSPB Ouse Fen. It was my definitely-amateur, but professional-seeming, togger friend Andy who first spotted it. It seemed to disappear at the water’s edge, but I spotted it again, sitting stock still in the water and we both got a few snapshots.

ISO redux

There was almost no photographic light left in the sky after sunet last night, but a Barn Owl flew past and I really just had to grab a shot even though I was just about to head home. My Canon R7 set to auto-ISO jumped to 20000, which is very high so the photo was very noisy/grainy. I usually denoise my images with DxO PureRaw 4 and for this one it had to be done. PureRaw drops the ISO by about three stops, so that’s as if the camera had been shooting at ISO 2500.

Low-light Barn Owl in flight
Barn Owl, image denoised with DxO PureRaw 4 and then gently edited in PaintShopPro

For those interested in such things, ISO ain’t what it used to be as I mentioned before. For film cameras, ISO was a measure of the sensitivity of the film. You used to use a higher ISO if you were shooting in lower light conditions.

For a digital camera, there’s no way to change the sensitivity of the sensor. So, adjusting the ISO does nothing more than turn up the brightness of the image you’ve captured and this brightness control is then embedded into the photo you download from the camera.

At lower light levels, your camera needs to turn up the brightness for the same shutter speed and aperture (f-stop) to get the exposure level you want. This means the noise is turned up brighter too, commonly seen as a purple speckles throughout the darker areas of the photo, but also impinging to different degrees across the whole image.

Now, the noise in a film photo is often referred to as grain (because it’s associated with the grain size of the particles of light-sensitive silver compounds in the film itself) It’s often seen as moody, romantic, and evocative, especially in noir Hollywood photos or the celebrity portrait work of David Bailey etc et cetera. It can be pleasing, just like the crackles and pops of classic vinyl…ish.

But, for digital photos, noise is just noise. It’s not grain, it’s not really romantic, nor evocative, it detracts and distorts the detail in your photo. So anything you can do to keep the ISO as low as possible and any processing that removes the noise without removing detail is, to my eye, a good thing. There are limits, but as regular viewers will know I almost always use DxO PureRaw to do the basic pre-edit processing of my photos. It essentially turns down the digital ISO control by three “stops” but without lowering the brightness.

The Barn Owl was shot at ISO 20000, so DxO is effectively bringing that down to ISO 2500, which is still way too high for a clean photo. But, it beats the RAW image straight out of the camera.

Incidentally, all this pre-processing and processing, is basically the digital equivalent of developing the film and printing from the negative as you would do with film. Some people imagine it’s somehow cheating because there are a lot more options allowing you to adjust levels and other stuff when you process digital negatives (the camera RAW) file, but it’s worth looking at the history of film photography to see how that nothing has changed fundamentally. Photography is not reality, it has always been about capturing a moment in time and developing it in such a way as to make that moment special after the event.

Barn Owl in flight pre-PSP
This is the Barn Owl as it looked after processing the RAW file with DxO but prior to adjust levels with PSP
Barn Owl
This is the Barn Owl as it looked before processing the RAW file with DxO
Barn Owl before and after DxO and PSP processing
Barn Owl before and after DxO and PSP processing

Egrets, I’ve seen a few

In the 1990s, East Anglian birders seeing this species locally might have noted it as a mega because it was so rarely seen in the UK, but as with the Little Egret, and more recently the Great White Egret, this ostensibly African species, the Cattle Egret, has spread its wings and found a home here. There are other species, such as Glossy Ibis, that are doing the same to a lesser degree, but may well become as common as those African egrets, given time.

Fluffed up Cattle Egret in a field behind a horse
Fluffed up Cattle Egret in a field behind a horse

The latter frequents muddy fields inhabited by hooved mammals, the other two the waterways and flooded gravel pits. Part of their spread is down to habitat formation over here but also the shifts in climate that mean they found conditions acceptable as they extended their range northwards out of Africa and then the Mediterranean region.

Fluffed up Cattle Egret
Fluffed up Cattle Egret

The Cattle Egret is the archetypal avian shytkicker, it follows cattle, horses, and sheep as they munch their way around fields and picks off the invertebrate life disturbed by the hooves; just as they would’ve done among the wildebeest and zebra in their homeland. They will also eat mice and frogs given the chance. They’re often quite grubby given they’re usually pecking about the mud of livestock farms and paddocks, but as they come into mating plumage they take on some lovely peachy feather shades within their brilliant white plumage.

Two fluffed up Cattle Egret in a field behind a horse
Two fluffed up Cattle Egret in a field behind a horse

Great White Egret has taken advantage of the crayfish in the lakes of Northern France. Having range extended to there several years ago, it’s not a big hop across La Manche to reach the Somerset Levels or East Anglian gravel pits.

Great White Egret
Great White Egret

Cattle Egrets bred in Somerset in 2008, according to the BTO website, with two pairs nesting there. There have been numerous breeding attempts since and the species is slowly expanding in southern Britain. The BTO statistics seem rather out of date, suggesting just 66 wintering birds in the UK. But, there were reports of a couple of hundred on the Somerset Levels and we have seen groups of a couple of dozen in the nearby village of Swavesey. Others report 30-40 in that same village and in and around Fen Drayton Lakes and other local areas. I hope the BTO will be updated soon. Certainly, BirdGuides no longer considers a Cattle Egret sighting as a mega these days.