36 years in science communication
Taking a flight of fancy with our feathered friends
These two birds I photographed in my in-law’s garden were anything but lovebirds, although they might look like they were dancing seconds before and seconds after they were tearing each other’s feathers off and spitting blood. This didn’t seem to be a bar-room brawl between chums fighting over fishy scraps, these two were at it for a good half an hour. It has to have been a territorial or mating rights argument of some sort.
Nature really is red in beak and claw.
The World Health Organization has expressed concern that a recent cluster of deaths associated with the H5N1 virus in Indonesia may not have originated with an animal host, suggesting the possibility of human to human transmission of the virus. However, it also cautions that the analytical evidence suggests that the virus has not mutated into a human transmissable form, which means we are not just yet on the verge of a global bird flu pandemic after all.
The news media inevitably picked up on this warning and ran with it, but thankfully the BBC saw the double-edged nature of the WHO announcement points out with some degree of rational response that many people in Indonesia, as in other southeast Asian countries, live in such close proximity to their animals and not necessarily in the most hygienic of circumstances that the likelihood of catching bird flu is much higher in such an environment.
It is the lack of a mutated form of H5N1 among these victims that means we are not yet doomed to see the feathers fly globally.
H5N1 at last reached British shores this month and now both the Eastern and Western seaboards of the USA are on tenterhooks. In the spirit of serious scientific debate, I’ve posted a poll all about avian influenza on the SciScoop Science Forum.
So, are we all doomed to be tarred and feathered or is it just a load of media fluff and feathers? You decide.Meanwhile, check out SciScoop regular contributor Chad’s excellent ongoing posting on the bird flu story on SciScoop.
Can anyone explain why we use the phrase “the birds and the bees” as a euphemism for explaining the facts of life to our children? Surely the sex life of bees is about as different from most people’s as you can imagine and birds…well…unless you’re talking about the male ostrich and a handful of other birds they don’t even have anything vaguely like the same “bits”.
I’ve often wondered why the honey and feathers didn’t go down too well on our honeymoon night.