Darwin online

charles-darwin

The world of online publishing continues to evolve and today marks a new landmark with the release on to the web of the complete works of one of history’s greatest scientists, Charles Darwin.

Every book, journal entry, and letter amounting to some 50,000 searchable pages and around 40,000 images from his original publications are now available to everyone with web access for free within a few mouseclicks.

Charles Darwin (1809-1882) revolutionized our understanding of life on earth and Darwin Online will revolutinize many people’s understanding of Darwin as well as bringing his findings to a much wider audience. The site represents the largest collection of his work ever assembled and allows users to search the complete text as well as view images of the original manuscripts in parallel. There are many documents that all but the keenest Darwin scholar will never have seen, including many previously unpublished transcriptions from his handwritten papers including the field notes from his seminal trip to the Galapagos islands.

Bible Reading Science Writer Wanted

Geordie Boffin PodcastI received a job ad indirectly from the Living Fuel website today, it seemed like a fairly run of the mill science writing job asking for a ghost writer-researcher to assist in writing a weekly health newsletter etc…

Usual kind of online job ad in other words.

The prospective candidates need experience in health and nutrition, obviously, and must be skilled at taking complex information and effectively communicating it to lay people. So far, so good.

One final qualification was asked for: “Working knowledge of the Bible a plus.”

Now, that’s not a run of the mill request for a science writing job. In fact, that has to be one of the most peculiar requirements for a scientific writing job I’ve ever seen. I don’t think even CS Monitor expect their science journos to have a working knowledge of the Bible. I was, however, intrigued and so took a look at the site. The first thing I noticed is that they’re basically selling some kind of health supplements. Fair enough. A testimonial from a satisfied customer provides no clues as to the Biblical intent, although the effects do seem miraculous.

Here’s the quote:

“I have had asthma since running competitively in high school and don’t like taking medications. Living fuel keeps my body alkalized and in balance so I can breathe clearly and naturally. Since using Living Fuel, I made the 4k World Cross Country Championships and finished 4th in the 2004 Olympic trials for the Steeplechase. I’m counting on Living Fuel to fuel me all the way to the 2008 Olympics!”
-Isaiah Festa, Madison, Wisconsin, USA”

Most of us don’t like taking medications, but the word medications is just that, a word. Taking any kind of supplement that has such a radical effect on the body as “alkanization” is essentially a medication whatever you call it. After all, nutraceuticals don’t sound like nutritional pharmaceuticals for nothing. The web seems to be full of product sites selling foods and supplements that claim to “alkanize the body” but I could find no mention of this “process” on any .edu or .ac.uk site and only one mention of the phrase in PubMed with regard to cell pH. Am I missing something, here?

Regardless, I’m still confused as to where the Bible reading comes into the job, I could find no mention of Christ on the site, and only a pdf file that cites Genesis in the references in the context of longevity. Needless to say, I probably won’t be applying for the job. I’m sure after reading my review of Richard Dawkins’ The God Delusion, they wouldn’t want to take me on anyway.

Teapots and the God Delusion

The God Delusion, Richard DawkinsRichard Dawkins told us in the 1970s that all organisms are nothing more than gene machines, robot zombies built by molecules we loosely know as genes to no end other than to ensure the replication of those very molecules. There is no purpose here, although Dawkins anthropomorphically endowed the genes with selfishness. Later, he extrapolated this concept of self-replicating entities to concepts, patterns of thought, that exist only in the organism we know as Homo sapiens and that are duplicated not by sex and reproduction but through communication via the systems we call culture. These self-replicating entities he referred to as memes.

It became apparent very early in the development of his meme theory that although a nursery rhyme or the concept that walking under a ladder may somehow bring one misfortune are persistent memes that can traverse the generations through repetition from parent to child and in playgrounds the world over, one meme in particular seems to have been with us since the beginning of human culture. The idea that there is a god, a creator, a supernatural entity that brought humanity and all the universe into existence purely for our benefit.

Dawkins believes this is a nonsense. Evolution teaches us that humans exist because as gene machines our ancestors were better suited to the environments they encountered and able to reproduce. Each one of us can trace our ancestry through a long-line of survivors all the way back to the Cambrian Explosion and beyond to the dawn of life on earth. However, consciousness brought with it the realisation of death, our emotional centres couldn’t cope with the death of loved ones nor the thought of our own mortality. It also brought with it curiosity about the very origins of the world and ourselves. Put the two together in the form of some kind of supernatural creator and the potential for this consciousness to persist after death and you have a good-feeling meme that explains everything and wards off the fear of death in one fell swoop.

Unfortunately, this simple meme, which may have seen our ancestors through many a dark night, spread and diverged into as many different forms as there are languages on the planet, so that today we have the Christian, Islamic, Hindu, Sikh, Juddaic, Neopaganist, Jeddist, etc version of this meme and all the trouble its interpretation brings.

Dawkins wants to set the record straight, there is no “God” of the organised religions. That god is as real as the teapot that orbits the far-side of the Sun, he says. In The God Delusion he attempts to persuade the believers that the very thing on which their faith is founded is nothing more than a self-replicating cultural entity going by the name of meme.

His thesis wins him no friends among the religious and the specifics of his argument are not always accepted by science (but that’s the way of science). But, at least he’s honest. The death of religion itself, Dawkins says, would free us from the prehistoric or at best mediaevel, attitudes and rules that have shackled us for generations to the notion of an afterlife for us and our loved ones. He sees much more purpose in the beauty of life itself without resorting to a benevolent creator.

If deleting this meme from the gene machines we know as Homo sapiens were possible, we might truly see the dawn of an age of rationality in which killing because one’s imaginery friend advised one to do so was no more.

Women as fast as men, almost

Sexual arousalScientists in Canada have used a close relative of night-vision goggles to watch women and men become sexually aroused while watching videos. Their study reveals that arousal happens in women just as rapidly as it does in men.

“Comparing sexual arousal between men and women, we see that there is no difference in the amount of time it takes healthy young men and women to reach peak arousal,’ says Irv Binik of McGill University Health Centre.

Rather than using manual intervention or genital connections, Binik focused thermographic cameras on his subjects’ genitals while they watched a montage of material from pornography to horror movies to The Best of Mr. Bean to Canadian tourism travelogues to provide a base of control data.

During the arousal experiment, the male and female subjects watched separate sexually explicit films procured from the Kinsey Institute and determined to be sexually arousing to specific genders. They watched the images through special video goggles to minimize distractions.

Binik remotely monitored body-temperature changes to within a 100th of a degree via a computer in a different room. Both the men and the women began showing arousal within 30 seconds. The men reached maximal arousal in about ten minutes, while women took a minute or two longer.

‘In any experiment on sexual arousal done in a laboratory, there is some distraction,’ concedes Binik. ‘But compared to previous techniques involving invasive measures or electrodes, this is minimally invasive and the same measurements are used for men and women, which makes it very interesting that the data ended up being the same.’

He says they’re the same, but if women are lagging behind the men by a minute or two in reaching full arousal, that could make all the difference for some couples, surely?

Colleague Tuuli Kukkonen adds that ‘This will help diagnose and treat sexual dysfunction in women, such as female sexual arousal disorder, which is poorly understood.’ Details of the work will appear in the Journal of Sexual Medicine in January 2007.

Lou Gehrig protein found

A protein involved in neurodegenerative diseases including Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), often known as Lou Gehrig’s Disease (covered by DB in spectroscopynow.com, 2005-01-01), has been identified by researchers in Germany and the US. Manuela Neumann and colleagues identified TDP-43 as the pathogenicprotein involved in this form of dementia. These illnesses are the second most common cause of dementia in the under 65s, after Alzheimer’s disease, and commonly afflict people in their 40s and 50s. TDP-43 is one of the missing misfolded proteins found in the pathology of neurodegenerative diseases. The researchers hope that their work will help in the study of dementia and motor neurone disease.

More information in the AAAS magazine Science today.

[Note, the original press release from AAAS actually said motor neutron disease, DB]

I Can Has Cheezburger

CheeseburgerI received a press release today from a US company addressing me by name and asking me whether I’d like to write about nanocardiology. Apparently, the company has a nanotech product in pre-clinical trials that cleans up arterial plaques. The putative product from St Louis company Kereos is based on endothelial alpha-v-beta-3 integrin-targeted fumagillin nanoparticles and can seek out markers for arterial plaques and help break them down.

Obviously, the implications for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease could be enormous, and the medical profession will be keen to see whether the company is successful with this product once it moves on to the clinical stage.

Remarkably though, the person who sent the press release signed off with a rather flippant remark: “Now bring on the cheeseburgers!”

Okay, it’s a joke. Haah, haah. But, hidden within that seemingly throwaway remark is decades of meat-eating substance abuse and an attitude to diet and health that underlies the very reason we in the west, and in particular in the US, are suffering such tragic levels of obesity, diabetes, hypertension and heart disease, surely?

We cannot continue to shovel in vast quantities of fatty red meat smothered with reconstituted dairy products and a guilty sliver of gherkin without long-term repurcussions. Never mind the vast tracts of wilderness, rainforest, and habitat that is being raised so that beef stocks can remain secured. Never mind the huge fences that segregate our cattle from the wildlife and in so doing block migratory routes to seasonal watering holes that have existed for countless millennia.

But, don’t worry about the buffalo and the wildebeest, the rainforest canopy, or the other effects of overindulgence on your health. Let’s all carry on eating those cheeseburgers safe in the knowledge that we’ll soon be able to pop a little pill that will scrape our arteries clean before that first heart attack.

Nobel Prize for Medicine 2006

This year US scientists Andrew Fire and Craig Mello have been awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine for their discovery of a fundamental mechanism that controls the flow of genetic information.

The human genome provides the DNA instructions for making proteins in the cell. These instructions are carried by messenger RNA (mRNA). Fire and Mello discovered a mechanism that can degrade mRNA from a specific gene, RNA interference. Details of this process, which they published in 1998, explain how it is activated when RNA molecules occur as double-stranded pairs in the cell. Double-stranded RNA activates biochemical machinery which degrades those mRNA molecules that carry a genetic code identical to that of the double-stranded RNA. When such mRNA molecules disappear, the corresponding gene is silenced and no protein of the encoded type is made.

Check out the Nobel site for more on today’s announcement.

Baby poop

It’s not a subject for polite conversatio, but anyone who has ever had to handle a soiled nappy (or diaper as our colleagues Stateside refer to them) will know that baby poop comes in a range of colours (unlike the apocryphal Ford Model T). The BabyPoop lens over on Squidoo offers a kind of litmus test, or more appropriately, a universal indicator paper strip, for the spectrum of options available.

Mustard coloured

 

poop is common for breastfed babies.

Whereas

 

Blue poop can only mean one thing…

Top Ten Hot Biologists

Purely in the interests of science, I headed over to flickr to see if I could find a snap of a particular biologist I was writing about today. Couldn’t find a single one, but all the faces that came up got me thinking that perhaps it would be fun and waste a few minutes when I should be working to pull together a list of the top biological totty. So, here it is a whirlwind tour of the world of biologists, in no particular order and no one vetted particularly closely.

Female biologists in action

  • Ninoka
  • Heather
  • Louise and friends
  • Susan
  • Claire
  • Alicia
  • Cerbu
  • Neguin
  • Elinay
  • Beck

For the sake of completeness, and to avoid accusations of sexism, I also gathered together ten male biologists in the field who also featured on flickr.

  • Glyn
  • John
  • Geoff
  • James
  • Dan
  • Alan
  • Bruce
  • Stan
  • Jeff
  • Chuck

I’ll leave it to Sciencebase readers to decide which if any should be in either top ten list. One thing to note, facial hair is common among biologists (but only in the second list).

Tomorrow, physicists on Pixsy.com and then chemists on myspace

Sex and phthalates

pvc dildos and phthalatesIt seems even the sex industry is not immune to chemophobia, according to a recent Greenpeace Netherlands announcement, users of PVC sex toys destined for orificial use should not. Use them, that is.

According to Greenpeace, these plastic devices can contain “extremely high concentrations of phthalate plasticisers which allegedly pose a risk to human health and the environment”. The organisation wants the European Union to ban the use of phthalates in sex toys as it already has done with phthalates previously used in the manufacturer of PVC childrens’ toys.

The Daily Telegraph reports how, “The environmental group said it was shocked to find that seven of the eight sex toys it had tested contained between 24 and 51 per cent of phthalates.”

Their actual report shows that individual phthalates in a range of products are at at trace amounts. They do report the presence of 490 g per kilo of di-isodecyl phthalate (DIDP) in one device as determined by GC/MS.

There is so much disinformation about phthalates on the web, that it is almost impossible to track down the actual levels of additives used as primary plasticisers in PVC products. I’d assume the percentage needs to be relatively high to make the devices we’re currently discussing “plastic” enough, but 51% seems very high regardless.

Moreover, where are the tests revealing how much of this “shocking” percentage might actually leach out of such a device during normal usage? And, even if there is a degree of leaching, does that correlate with actual risk to health. These questions are yet to be answered for any devices whether sex toys, children’s toys or medical devices.

Any thoughts?